Journal Home
Search for

Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 790-795 (August 2009)


View previous. 13 of 13

TiF4 and NaF at pH 1.2 but not at pH 3.5 are able to reduce dentin erosion

Annette WiegandaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ana Carolina Magalhãesb, Beatrice Senera, Elena Waldheimc, Thomas Attina

Accepted 4 May 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This study aimed to analyse and compare the protective effect of buffered (pH 3.5) and native (pH 1.2) TiF4 in comparison to NaF solutions of same pH on dentin erosion.

Design

Bovine samples were pretreated with 1.50% TiF4 or 2.02% NaF (both 0.48M F) solutions, each with a pH of 1.2 and 3.5. The control group received no fluoride pretreatment. Ten samples in each group were eroded with HCl (pH 2.6) for 10×60s. Erosion was analysed by determination of calcium release into the acid. Additionally, the surface and the elemental surface composition were examined by scanning electron microscopy (two samples in each group) and X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy in fluoridated but not eroded samples (six samples in each group). Cumulative calcium release (nmol/mm2) was statistically analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA at t=10min.

Results

TiF4 and NaF at pH 1.2 decreased calcium release significantly, while TiF4 and NaF at pH 3.5 were not effective. Samples treated with TiF4 at pH 1.2 showed a significant increase of Ti, while NaF pretreatment increased F concentration significantly. TiF4 at pH 1.2 led to the formation of globular precipitates occluding dentinal tubules, which could not be observed on samples treated with TiF4 at pH 3.5. NaF at pH 1.2 but not at pH 3.5 induced the formation of surface precipitates covering dentinal tubules.

Conclusion

Dentin erosion can be significantly reduced by TiF4 and NaF at pH 1.2, but not at pH 3.5.

a Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland

b Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, USP, Bauru, SP, Brazil

c Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 634 32 71; fax: +41 44 634 43 08.

PII: S0003-9969(09)00121-6

doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.05.004


View previous. 13 of 13