Archives of Oral Biology
Volume 55, Issue 3 , Pages 223-228, March 2010

Effect of TiF4, ZrF4, HfF4 and AmF on erosion and erosion/abrasion of enamel and dentin in situ

  • Annette Wiegand

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 6343412; fax: +41 44 6344308.
  • ,
  • Barbara Hiestand

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Beatrice Sener

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Ana Carolina Magalhães

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, USP, Bauru, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Malgorzata Roos

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Thomas Attin

      Affiliations

    • Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

Accepted 15 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This in situ study aimed to analyse the impact of different tetrafluorides (TiF4, ZrF4 and HfF4) and AmF on erosion and erosion plus abrasion of enamel and dentin.

Design

Ten volunteers took part in this crossover and double-blind study performed in 8 phases of each 3 days. In each phase, 2 bovine enamel and 2 dentin specimens were fixed in intraoral appliances. One enamel and one dentin sample were pretreated once with TiF4, ZrF4, HfF4 or AmF (all 0.5M F) for 60s, while the other samples remained unfluoridated and served as control. Then, all samples were subjected to either erosion only (4 times/day, 90s) or to erosion and abrasion (2 times/day, 30s/sample). Toothbrushing abrasion was performed 90min after the first and last erosion with an electrical toothbrush and fluoridated toothpaste at 1.2N. After 3 days, enamel and dentin loss was assessed by profilometry (μm) and analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-test (p<0.05).

Results

All fluoride solutions reduced enamel and dentin loss significantly compared to the controls. Generally, eroded samples showed less wear than eroded and abraded samples. The protective potential of the fluorides was not significantly different and was only slightly, but mostly not significantly, decreased by abrasion. The protective effect of the fluoride solutions was similar in enamel and dentin.

Conclusion

Tetrafluorides and AmF are able to reduce erosion and erosion plus abrasion in situ and are almost equally effective.

Keywords: Enamel, Dentin, Erosion, Fluoride

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0003-9969(09)00296-9

doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.11.007

Archives of Oral Biology
Volume 55, Issue 3 , Pages 223-228, March 2010